|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
REDUCE TAXES!
CHECK OUT THE TAX PROPHET'S Action Guides |
Introduction Evidently, Goggle's slogan "do no evil" does not apply to its U.S. tax obligations. By using a complicated offshore tax strategy, Google lowered its overseas tax rate to just 2.4%, making it the leading tax dodger among the largest technology companies. Over three years, Google avoided approximately $3.1 billion in U.S. taxes, according to a recent article in Bloomberg. Google is not alone: Microsoft, Facebook and a host of other multinational corporations engage in similar schemes. | |||
The Ploy |
Here's a simplified version of how multi-nationals avoid U.S. taxes on their overseas profits:
| |||
The Result |
Multi-nationals are taxed under U.S. law when and if profits are repatriated, which may never occur. These companies, with billions stashed off shore, are constantly lobbying for a special tax rate (usually 5%) as an incentive to repatriate their profits. Consequently, they avoid U.S. taxes when they earn profits, accumulate untaxed billions overseas for years, and then demand a preferential tax rate to repatriate their off-shore earnings.
| |||
IRS's Blessing |
IRS and Google entered into a special arrangement, called an advanced pricing agreement, that fixed the value of Google's search and advertising intellectual property for foreign transfer purposes, thereby blessing Google's use of this tax dodge. Google is taxable in the U.S. on this amount. Of course, Google wanted the value as low as possible and, presumably, hired an army of financial advisors to make its case. Because the agreement is secret, the fairness of the deal cannot be scrutinized.
| |||
Conclusion |
Google's off-shore tax dodge demonstrates how the international tax system allows multi-national corporations to effectively circumvent tax obligations to the U.S. government and throughout the world. Although the Obama administration tried to address the problem, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, heavy lobbying pressure from General Electric, Johnson & Johnson and Starbucks caused Treasury to drop the proposal.
| |||
| |||||
|
| All
contents copyright © 2010 Robert L. Sommers, attorney-at-law. All
rights reserved. This newsletter provides information of a general
nature for educational purposes only and is not intended to be legal
or tax advice. This information has not been updated to reflect
subsequent changes in the law, if any. Your particular facts and
circumstances, and changes in the law, must be considered when applying
U.S. tax law. You should always consult with a competent tax
professional licensed in your state with respect to your particular
situation. The Tax Prophet ® is a registered trademark of Robert L.
Sommers.
|
|