[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]

June, 2001 Hot Topics - part 1 of a 2-part series

2001 Tax Reform Act

Introduction

         George Bush delivered on his campaign promise to lower tax rates – sort of. But Democrats in Congress can claim that they provided tax relief to the poor and also expanded educational tax breaks. Actually, the new tax law contains significant changes, but its impact will be much less than politicians would have you believe. Many of the benefits are “back-loaded,” meaning they occur years from now. However, all taxpayers will immediately benefit from the reduction in tax rates from 15% to 10% for the first $6,000 to $12,000 of taxable income, depending on whether you are a single or joint filer, and should receive a refund check from the Treasury of between $300 and $600 later this year.

           The highly-touted repeal of the estate tax applies only to those “lucky” enough to die during tax year 2010. Further, the estate tax has been replaced with a new tax scheme, mind-boggling in its complexity. After 2010, the clock turns back to 2001 and none of the estate tax reforms enacted will apply.

           However, there are plenty of benefits in the new tax legislation; ironically, most of the tax breaks come from Democratic proposals.  Tax rates for everyone have been reduced from 15% to 10%, estate tax exemptions will rise as soon as 2002, and retirement/education accounts have been liberalized.  There are no changes in the capital gains rates or holding periods and only a modest change in the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT).  Here’s a sampling of the 2001 tax cut provisions:


Income Tax Rates

          Marginal income tax rates will be lowered according to the following table: 

Current 6/1/01 2002 & 2003 2004 & 2005 2006
28% 27.5% 27% 26% 25%
31% 30.5% 30% 29% 28%
36% 35.5% 35% 34% 33%
39.6% 39.1% 38.6% 37.6% 35%

          To determine how the legislation will affect your tax bill, check out the Estimated Tax Calculator developed by Commerce Clearing House at (http://tax.cch.com/taxcalc).  According to this calculator, a married couple filing jointly, with two children would see the following reductions in tax in 2001: 

Gross Income Adjusted Gross Income Tax Savings
50,000 40,000 $800
100,000 80,000 $974
500,000 400,000 $2,340
1,000,000 800,000 $4,574
10,000,000 8,000,000 $40,374

 

           Comment:  Since those in the top 20% income bracket pay approximately 80% of the taxes and those in the top 1% pay 20% of the personal income taxes, the reduction in marginal tax rates overwhelmingly benefits the richest taxpayers.  A reduction in the highest tax brackets, from 39.6% to 35%, represents a savings of $4,600 in taxes for each $100,000 of taxable income over $340,000 (the projected beginning point for the highest tax bracket for 2006).  Thus, a taxpayer with $1 million of income in the highest bracket saves $46,000.  A taxpayer with a $1 billion of income saves $4.6 million because of the change.  Because lower tax rates phase-in over time, deferring income to later years will become the new game in town.

           However, there is a major catch:  The AMT rates have not been changed, so more taxpayers will fall within the AMT.  By the time the full tax rate reduction is phased-in, it is estimated that the number of taxpayers falling within the AMT will increase 6-fold.  The AMT exemptions have been raised a modest $2,000 and $4,000 for single and joint filers respectively.  Thus, our politicians once again, have given with one hand, but taken away with the other through the operation of the AMT.


          Starting in July, 2001, there is a new 10% tax bracket that applies as follows: 

Filing Status Taxable Income Savings
Single $0- $6,000 $300
Head/Household $0- $10,000 $500
Joint $0- $12,000 $600

 

           For single and joint filers, the $6,000 and $12,000 caps are raised to $7,000 and $14,000, respectively, starting in 2008. 

           This new tax bracket applies to the poor as well as Bill Gates, so everyone will benefit to the tune of a couple of hundred dollars.  Congress wanted this new bracket to take effect as of January 1, 2001, so there is a complex “credit” system now in place in which the Treasury will send checks out as soon as it can get its act together.

           Comment:  Shifting income to children over age 14 should become a new tax-planning tool since the income will be taxed at the 10% bracket for the first $6,000 of income (a $300 annual savings).

           Comment:  In reality, we have two income tax systems, the regular income tax system which the politicians discuss, and the AMT, which Congress uses to recapture taxes lost under the regular income tax system.  Generally, the regular tax system (rates ranging from 10% to 35% when the new legislation is fully phased-in) uses a series of exemptions and credits to lower taxable income.  The regular tax system can be thought of as a “net tax” system because it applies after all allowable deductions, exemptions and credits are taken into account.  In contrast AMT (with tax rates of 26% and 28%) is akin to a “gross tax” system since many of the benefits permitted under the regular tax system are disallowed under the AMT.  Taxpayers compute their taxes under both systems and pay the higher tax produced.  As the regular system tax rates are lowered, the AMT takes precedence, because its exemptions and tax rate structures have not been indexed for inflation.

           To illustrate: Suppose the single person making $250,000 a year in wages and the married couple earning $500,000 a year in wages also had $200,000 worth of incentive stock options (a preference item under the AMT which is added to income).  Note: For simplicity, there are no other income sources and no itemized deductions. TurboTax’s Tax Estimator software was used to determine these numbers.   The result:  There is no advantage to either.  Thus, what the tax cut offers, the AMT overrides.

           Note:  Those who claim an itemized deduction for their state taxes are also impacted by the AMT since those deductions are not allowed when calculating the tax.

Single Taxpayer Current New Tax Schedule Difference
Regular Tax 76,447 69,686 6,579
AMT 46,053 53,632 -6,579
Total Tax 122,500 122,500 0
Tax Savings 0 0 0
       
Joint Taxpayer      
Regular Tax 156,575 151,025 5,550
AMT 35,925 41,475 -5,550
Total Tax 192,500 192,500 0
Tax Savings 0 0 0

Marriage Penalty Relief

 For those married couples filing jointly who use the standard deduction, there is an increase in the standard deduction to eliminate the so-called marriage penalty.  Unfortunately, this benefit is severely back-loaded: no change will occur until 2005.  Currently, two single individuals living together have a combined deduction that is greater than a married couple filing jointly.  However, the phase-in of this tax break occurs according to the following schedule (200% = parity with single filers):

Year Percentage
2005 174%
2006 186%
2007 187%
2008 190%
2009 200%

            A similar adjustment to the 15% tax bracket will occur so that in 2008 and thereafter, the end-point (the last dollar eligible for the 15% bracket) for joint filers will equal 200% of the end-point for single filers.  The end-point for a married person filing a separate return will be 50% of the end-point for a joint filer.

           This so-called marriage penalty relief will not benefit most married couples who either own a home or live in a high-tax state since they will still need to itemize deductions to claim mortgage interest and property and state income tax deductions.


 Elimination of the Personal Exemption and Itemized Deduction Phase-Outs

           Currently, personal exemptions are phased-out for single taxpayers with adjusted gross incomes of $132,950 and $199,450 for joint filers at the rate of 2% for each $2,500 of AGI over these thresholds.  Itemized deductions are currently reduced by 3% for the amount of a taxpayer’s AGI exceeding $132,950, for both single and joint filers.

           Starting in 2006, the phase-out for personal exemptions and itemized deductions are eliminated according to the following table: 

Year Reduction in exemption limitation
2006 & 2007 33.33%
2008 & 2009 66.67%
2010 100.00%

           Comment:  This is a substantial benefit to those in higher income tax brackets but once again, the benefit is back-loaded, commencing in 2006.


Child Tax Credits

           Currently, taxpayers are entitled to a $500 tax credit for each child under age 17. These credits will be increased as follows: 

Year Amount
2001-2004 $600
2005-2008 $700
2009 $800
2010 $1,000

           These tax credits are refundable to the extent a taxpayer’s earned income exceeds $10,000 (indexed for inflation starting in 2002) as follows: 

Year Percentage
2001-2004 10%
2005 15%

           For families with three or more children, there is an alternative method to measure the refundable credit.  Credit amounts do not constitute income for purposes of qualifying for federally-funded assistance programs.  The child tax credit will apply against AMT beginning in 2002.

           Comment:  This tax break will benefit those in the lower income tax brackets, although once again, the tax break is phased-in slowly. 


Educational IRA’s

           The amount that can be contributed to an Educational IRA has been increased from $500 to $2,000 per beneficiary and the concept of “qualified education expenses” has been expanded to include elementary and secondary school expenses, including computer-related equipment and technology courses.  Importantly, the phase-out range for joint filers has been increased from $190,000 to $220,000 of AGI (as modified under the Educational IRA rules).  The age limitations for beneficiaries do not apply to special needs beneficiaries.  Corporations (including non-profit institutions) may make contributions to Education IRAs, regardless of their incomes).

           The Education IRA funds may be used along with the HOPE and Lifetime Learning Credits and there is no longer an excise tax when contributions are made to both an Educational IRA and to the same beneficiary under a qualified State Tuition program.


 Deductions for Student Loans; Employer-Provided Assistance

           The income eligibility phase-out for the interest deduction on student loans has been increased from $50,000 to $65,000 for single filers and $100,000 to $130,000 for joint filers.  These amounts will be adjusted annually for inflation after 2002.  There is no longer a restriction on the number of months that interest may be deductible; also, voluntary payments of interest are now deductible.  Employer-provided assistance now applies to both undergraduate and graduate education.


 Deduction for Higher Education Expenses

           There will be a new deduction for qualified higher education expenses paid during tax years 2002 through 2005 according to the following table: 

Year Maximum AGI Amounts
Single/Joint
Maximum Deduction
2002 & 2003 $65,000/$130,000 $3,000
2004 & 2005 $65,000/$130,000 $4,000
2002-2005 $80,000/$160,000 $2,000

 

 

           Taxpayers cannot claim this deduction and either the HOPE or Lifetime Learning Credit under the same year.  No deduction is allowed for amounts which are tax-free under an Educational IRA or for tax-free interest from an educational savings bond.

           Comment:  These are serious tax breaks from which many taxpayers with education costs can benefit.  Note, even taxpayers whose income exceeds the limitations may have parents or relatives who can contribute to the Educational IRA’s for the taxpayer’s children; however, the maximum contribution for a beneficiary from all contributors is $2,000 per year. 

           Because of the interplay between this new tax break and the HOPE and Lifetime Learning Credit, each taxpayer will have to run the numbers with respect to his or her own situation to determine whether it is better to claim a HOPE or Lifetime Learning Credit or the new deduction for higher education expenses.

 

[an error occurred while processing this directive]