![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
||
|
|
COMPARING A GIFT OF STOCK BY A FOREIGN PERSON TO AN INDIVIDUAL VS. A FOREIGN TRUST Issue: What are the legal and tax consequences of an
outright gift of stock by a foreign person (defined below) to a
foreign individual compared to a gift of stock to a foreign trust
for the benefit of that individual? Note: Recent changes in U.S. tax laws could subject the foreign trust to U.S. taxation if the foreign grantor becomes a resident or citizen of the U.S. within 5 years of the trust's creation. If the trust will have U.S. beneficiaries, then the trust must be revocable by the foreign grantor; otherwise, the U.S. beneficiaries will be taxed on their pro-rata share of the trust's income at the time of distribution. Also, amounts accumulated by the trust for later distribution to U.S. beneficiaries are subject to a new (and higher) interest charge on the deferred taxes. Note: The term, "foreign individual" or "foreign person" means a non-U.S. citizen or resident. A "grantor" is the person creating a trust. A "donor" is the person making a gift. A "donee" is the person receiving a gift. Under U.S. tax law, in general, donors are taxed on gifts; donees receive gifts tax-free. A foreign person who is a donor is usually not taxed on gifts of foreign property (real property, cash, tangible and intangible property, located outside the U.S.). Whether property is subject to U.S. gift tax is a complex subject and is covered at Estate and Gift Transactions for Foreign Taxpayer. Answer: An outright gift of stock to an individual is
a transfer of ownership to that individual. The individual has
the unrestricted right to sell or assign that stock to any other
person. The individual is taxed on the dividend income from the
stock, any gains from the sale of the stock, and will have an
estate tax based on the value of the stock. In contrast, a foreign trust can be structured so that a
foreign beneficiary can avoid all income and estate taxes on the
stock. The trust can protect against the beneficiary selling or
assigning the stock, or voting his interest in a manner
detrimental to the corporation. The trust can protect a
beneficiary's interest against a spouse, creditor or an
expropriating government.
Conclusion: A trust offers a multitude of advantages
over individual ownership of stock. Trusts should be used
whenever possible to protect assets. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||
| [Wealth Preservation] [Employee Stock Options] [Foreign Taxpayers] [Tax & Trust Scams] [Expert Witness] [General Tax Information] |
| All contents copyright © 2007 Robert L. Sommers, attorney-at-law. All rights reserved. This internet site provides information of a general nature for educational purposes only and is not intended to be legal or tax advice. This information has not been updated to reflect subsequent changes in the law, if any. Your particular facts and circumstances, and changes in the law, must be considered when applying U.S. tax law. You should always consult with a competent tax professional licensed in your state with respect to your particular situation. The Tax Prophet(TM) is a trademark of Robert L. Sommers. |