FAQ 9 03: Compensation Paid in Company Stock   Violating Residence Exclusion Rules   Advisability of Off-Shore Asset Protection Trusts

The Tax Prophet :: September 2003 FAQ

  Home  >  FAQ  >   September 2003  

 FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS  
   
  Compensation Paid in Stock
  Violating Residence Exclusion Rules
  Legality of Off-Shore Asset Protection Trusts
  I work for a closely-held corporation that wants to pay part of my compensation in its company stock. What are my tax consequences?
  If the stock does not have much value, take the stock right now and have the company pay you a bonus equal to the taxes payable on receipt of the stock. The stock received is treated as compensation so the company needs to withhold on it. Otherwise, there are a variety of employee stock option programs that could meet your needs.

Also, you'll want to verify that the stock qualifies under IRC Sec. 1244 and you own it without restrictions. Sec. 1244 stock allows an ordinary loss, rather than a capital loss, on sale, or if the stock becomes worthless - a big advantage in such a circumstance.

See Also: See: The Tax Prophet's Section on Employee Stock Options

  I bought a home in California 7 months ago and now want to sell it and move to Portland. I'll make $44,000 on the transaction. May I rollover the gain into my Portland home?
  No, the residency rollover rules were terminated about 6 years ago. The current rule involves a residency exclusion which entitles you to exclude up to $250,000 in profits from the sale of a residence ($500,000 for joint filers) provided you owned and lived in the residence for at least 24 months. It sounds like you do not meet this test, unless your move was due to a change of employment, health or other unforeseeable circumstance, in which case, 7/24 of the exemption would apply.

See Also: See: The Tax Prophet's Tax Class on Principal Residence
  Do you believe an off-shore asset protection trust can be successfully used to defeat a creditor's claim?
  No. In my view, the creation of an off-shore trust to thwart U.S. law or potential creditors is improper, usually fraudulent and sometimes illegal. There could be legitimate uses for off-shore trusts, such as estate planning with multi-jurisdiction beneficiaries, but such trusts must comply with IRS disclosure and reporting requirements.

See Also: See: The Tax Prophet's Tax Class on Asset Protection


Home |  Who We Are |  What's New |  Search |  Contact Us |  Subscribe

| [Tax Class] | [Hot Topics] | [Estate Planning] | [Employee Stock Options] | [Tax & Trust Scams] | [Foreign Taxes] | [Tax Columns] | [Tax Publications] | [Tax Hound] | [Interactice Apps] | [Cyber Surfing] |
All contents copyright © 1995-2003 Robert L. Sommers, attorney-at-law. All rights reserved. This internet site provides information of a general nature for educational purposes only and is not intended to be legal or tax advice. This information has not been updated to reflect subsequent changes in the law, if any. Your particular facts and circumstances, and changes in the law, must be considered when applying U.S. tax law. You should always consult with a competent tax professional licensed in your state with respect to your particular situation. The Tax Prophet® is a registered trademark of Robert L. Sommers.